« Home | Can we kill Howard Roark ? » | The Culprit in Indianism » | North and South are different directions » | Good, Bad and the Ugly » | Who is paying for your food? » | Undisclosed » | 1 + 1 = 2? » | Its income disparity again » | Is the Indian housing bubble a myth or a reality? » | The Other side of IT, Onsite & NRI's » 

Tuesday, May 22, 2007 

Mere Bharat Magan!

There was a huge row over the recent 150th year celebration of the 1857 revolution and the patrons did emphasize as to how it showcases patriotism. My rage hit its breaking point after a hard fought argument with my friend as we were battling about the so-called attributes of patriotism. The pressing judgment was as to how singing the national anthem or saluting the national flag was deemed to be a great act of patriotism. I could not stand it; there is a great deal of difference between being mad about symbolism and the underlying fervor, which might not warrant symbols. Symbols are created to identify or communicate the underlying principle, the principle as such lives eternally in the thought monuments even if the symbols, which identified them, cease to exist.

I get to recollect a popular example quoted by Kamala Hassan in his film "Anbe Sivam". Love would be cherished even if the Taj Mahal were to be ram shackled. Communism is a feeling, which would continue to amaze everyone when the underlying egalitarian thought is provoked in our everyday life moments. It was there and would be there, although an attempt in the Soviet Union has been faltered. There is a difference between validity of the concept and the fallouts in execution. We would be insulting Gandhi if we wore Khadhi, preached indignity of fellow beings, mocked self-respect and humiliated truth.

Now to the National Anthem, I surely admit that it is a good way to express our love for the nation by singing it. If at all we love our nation, we would have taken some time to know what it means. No excuses that it in Bengali, Let us not humiliate our beloved Bharat Matha that we didn't care to know what was praised about her in the past 26 years of our life.

I thought, I’d take this opportunity to revive the controversy about the acceptance of Jana Gana Mana as our anthem. The poem was composed in December 1911, precisely at the time of the Coronation Durbar of George V, and is a paean in praise of "the overlord of India's destiny". The composition was first sung during a convention of the then loyalist Indian National Congress in Calcutta on Dec. 27, 1911.It was sung on the second day of the convention, and the agenda of that day devoted itself to a loyal welcome of George V on his visit to India.

So what is this patriotism? It denotes positive and supportive attitudes to a 'fatherland'. Patriotism covers such attitudes as: pride in its achievements and culture, the desire to preserve its character and the basis of the culture, and identification with other members of the nation. Nationalism, in its broadest sense, is a devotion to one's own nation and its interests over those of all other nations

Oh My God, lets be true with ourselves whether we are being patriotic or nationalistic. We can't stop in our traffic signals, we can't stop breaking que's and we damn to care about the implication of breaking laws. Leave along being selfless for the sake of the nation, we would rather complain about how ruthless the nation is.

Now to the all important as to whether nationalism is relevant in this era. I feel, Patriotism is finding slimmer woods after the electronic herd hit us in the last decade. The cultural identities are becoming flat; we see globules of people in different pockets of the world trying to identify themselves with homogeneous compatriots past the physical boundaries of the nations. All we need is a yahoo group or orkut community to express our thought, which resonates with somebody else, who has a different cultural background.


PS:
(For people who wanted to know the meaning of our national anthem... if you feel it praises the rich cultural past of India, you might want to know it should be sung in 52 seconds. If you were left wondering where the praise hides in it, you have to seek some other way out..)

Thou art the ruler of the minds of all people,
dispenser of India's destiny.
Thy name rouses the hearts of Punjab, Sindh, Gujarat, the Maratha country,
in the Dravida country, Utkala (Orissa) and Bengal;
It echoes in the hills of the Vindhyas and Himalayas,
it mingles in the rhapsodies of the pure waters Jamuna and the Ganges.
They chant only thy name,
they seek only thy blessings,
They sing only thy praise.
The saving of all people waits in thy hand,
thou dispenser of India's destiny.Victory, Victory, Victory, Victory to thee.

Labels:

" [...] There is a difference between validity of the concept and the fallouts in execution. [...]"

Really reassuring to know that there are people who knows this simple fact, and doesn't laugh at an idea calling it 'impractical' just because of a failure in execution. :)

'There is a difference between validity of the concept and the fallouts in execution.'
I think thats the thing...i think certain concepts as the one u were exemplifying using this sentence are those which as a concept can only lead to faulty execution...especially in the long run....

and the thing abt symbols and national anthem.. although i havent bothered to research on the meaning of the national anthem..i would say that it doesnt really matter...yeah and slowly the concept of a nation itself is disappearing...Soon nations i think willl not have distinct bodders but more like a contiguous distribution of geographies with gradients all across it indicating homogenities...

Post a Comment

World as I Think is powered by Blogspot and Gecko & Fly.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.
First Aid and Health Information at Medical Health